Perdomo Lot 23 Cigar Review

September 28, 2011 · Posted in Cigar Review · Comment 

I received this cigar from Cigars Direct. My opinions are my own.

Even though I am sure that there are a lot of people who love Perdomos I cannot say that I particularly like them. It’s not that they are horrible cigars; they aren’t. They are usually constructed and burn well. For me, they tend to not have flavors that I love. But maybe this one is different.

It looks like a really nice cigar. No raised veins, just a couple minor discolored spots, oily and packed perfectly. Let me just say that the torpedo vitola is one of my favorites and I’m happy to be smoking another one for this review.

Cigar Stats

Vitola: Torpedo
Length: 5 ¾
Ring Gauge: 54
Wrapper: Nicaragua
Binder: Nicaragua
Filler: Nicaragua
Price: $100.00/Box of 13

The Wall Sizzle!

The prelight draw is wide open and gives off hints of wet wood. After being lit there are flavors ranging from sweet wood to burnt wood. Those flavors quickly transition into a meandering deep sweetness. It’s not a bad flavor; it’s actually kind of nice.

And then, like a rabid mongoose after a snake, the sweetness blossoms into this earthy bitterness with a hint of chocolate. Bitterness is a great addition when it is offsetting sweetness.

Both the draw and the burn are great. This is a medium bodied cigar but the flavors are in full force.

Sweetness all but departs after the first half. The earthy, bitter and chocolate flavors take over. It is a good grouping of flavors. I really like this cigar.

I just looked over my previous short cigar review of this cigar and everything is adding up. It is a good cigar and is a credit to the Perdomo line of cigars. But is it a great cigar? Yes, but just barely.

90 points

It looks like a really nice cigar. No raised veins, just a couple minor discolored spots, oily and packed perfectly. Let me just say that the torpedo vitola is one of my favorites and I’m happy to be smoking another one for this review.

Lizard Torch!

The prelight draw is wide open and gives off hints of wet wood. After being lit there are flavors ranging from sweet wood to burnt wood. Those flavors quickly transition into a meandering deep sweetness. It’s not a bad flavor; it’s actually kind of nice.

And then, like a rabid mongoose after a snake, the sweetness blossoms into this earthy bitterness with a hint of chocolate. Bitterness is a great addition when it is offsetting sweetness.

Both the draw and the burn are great. This is a medium bodied cigar but the flavors are in full force.

Sweetness all but departs after the first half. The earthy, bitter and chocolate flavors take over. It is a good grouping of flavors. I really liked this cigar.

I just looked over my previous short cigar review of this cigar and everything is adding up. It is a good cigar and is a credit to the Perdomo line of cigars. But is it a great cigar? Yes, but just barely.

90 points

Patel Brothers Short Cigar Review

August 10, 2011 · Posted in Cigar Review, Short Cigar Review · Comment 

0/3: It looks like a fairly well made cigar. A little hard to the touch but it is still a visually appealing cigar. Not a lot of oils on the wrapper.

On a separate issue, is the point of the name – Patel Brothers – supposed to evoke longing memories of Mario Bros? Maybe whilst lighting the cigar you will be brought back to that time you ate the mushroom and squashed the spiked turtle – digitally, of course.

Wrapper: Connecticut Broadleaf   |   Binder: Nicaraguan   |   Filler: Nicaraguan   |   Box of 20: $80.00   |   Torpedo   |   6″ x 52

1/3: Starts out enjoyable even though the flavors are borderline harsh. By that I mean there is a separation between the flavors, which are earth, smokiness, and bitter cocoa; and the overall smoking experience, which is bitter.

2/3: A mild sweetness has started to come through during the second third. Strong and dark is the name of the game here but, so far, I am enjoying this cigar more than I thought I would. An extremely earthy cigar.

3/3: The sweetness is still a background flavor but it has grown in prominence and it is providing a decent counterbalance to the robust earthiness that is evident in this cigar’s flavor profile. The sweetness is a little odd: it’s closer to straight, natural sugar than to anything else I can think of.

4/3: Unless you want an extremely earthy experience this probably is not a cigar for you. It also at times harsh and, because of that, the flavors can come off as being overbearing and not good. Personally, I would smoke this cigar again but I will not be seeking this cigar out. If it’s part of a deal I wouldn’t balk at it though.

3 points

Casa Magna Oscuro Cigar Review

January 26, 2011 · Posted in Cigar Review, Short Cigar Review · Comment 

I like the Casa Magna Colorado. It’s a very good cigar.

Full disclosure: I received this cigar from Cigars Direct. All reviews are my own.

Wrapper: Honduras | Binder: Honduras | Filler: Honduras & Nicaragua

Vitola: Toro – 6″x52 | Price: App. $33.oo/5 pack

0/3: Good looking cigar. Very dark wrapper. Feels dry to the touch.

1/3: Bitter chocolate and dry wood. It’s starting out a little interesting. Not quite sure if it’s a good or a bad “interesting” yet. Can already tell that I’m not liking it as much as I liked the Casa Magna Colorado. The Oscuro seems like it may lapse into being harsh over the course of the cigar.

Also am getting some grassy notes during this third.

2/3: Retains a lot of that bitter chocolate flavor. There is also some graham cracker apparent during this third. This is the third where it begins to become a little too harsh for me. The flavors are okay but nothing spectacular.

3/3: Getting a little too bitter at this point and it has its spots of harshness. It’s a medium bodied cigar with a good draw and burn.

4/3: While this cigar does have its moments where it is good I’m afraid to say that for the majority of the time it under performs. Too bad, really, because I had such high hopes for it.

2.5 points – Prove me wrong, get this sampler to try the Casa Magna Oscuro.

CAO Brazilia Cigar Review

January 24, 2011 · Posted in Cigar Review · 5 Comments 

I remember reviewing this cigar once before but it turns out I have reviewed this cigar twice before. Those two reviews were on the Samba vitola (6 ¼” x 54) but this one is on the Gol! (5” x 56), so it should provide some valuable information for you. This cigar was given to me by Cigars Direct.

Chubby cigar with a decent sheen of oils on it. The wrapper is dark with a multitude of little white specs. There are a couple of holes; one rather largish. A bunch of thin veins span the distance of the cigar. Fairly tightly packed.

Cigar Stats
Robusto
Lenght: 5″
Ring Guage: 56
Wrapper: Brazil
Binder: Nicaragua
Filler: Nicaragua
Price: $33.00/5 Pack | $95.00/Box of 20

Maloof Fire!

Starts out very well. Earth, chocolate and spice are the troika that makes up the flavors in the beginning. Those flavors add on a meaty flavor after an inch or two. Some saltiness too.

It is not a very powerful cigar but I would still peg it as being full bodied. Well, medium-full bodied. The flavors are quite nice; most CAO cigars are pretty good in my estimation. The draw is good and so is the burn. Those holes that I told you about haven’t hurt the performance of the cigar.

Flavors are very lively. Maybe a little too much on the bitter side for my taste but it is definitely a very enjoyable cigar. Just as I wrote that it got a little bitterer. It’s quickly approaching the Rubicon of being too bitter.

It is a consistently good cigar and, fortunately enough, it never passed that Rubicon. Solid flavors and very enjoyable. Pick some

88 points

Sencillo Short Churchill Cigar Review

December 30, 2010 · Posted in Cigar Review, Guest Cigar Review · 2 Comments 

Today we have a very special review from Danny (@dannysguitar is his Twitter handle). He’s a cool guy and he has done an awesome review of the Sencillo Short Churchill. Enjoy!

First off, I would like to thank Travis for inviting me for a guest review on his site.  Today we have for you the Sencillo Short Churchill.  I have smoked my way through a box of these and this is one of the last sticks I have.  A little background on this cigar.  Keith K Park, owner of Prometheus and God of Fire was looking for an everyday cigar to add to his portfolio.  He contacted Christian Eiora of Camacho cigars to put together some blends for him.  This is the one that was chosen.  So let’s light it up!

Giving the cigar a good once over reveals a nice dark wrapper. Tightly packed, and heavy for it’s size. This particular cigar is a Honduran puro. Prelight smell is sweet tobacco on the wrapper.  Almost like vanilla. The foot is more musty barnyard with a touch of spice, maybe cinnamon?  I decided to use a punch on this cigar and the prelight draw gives me slight pepper.

Cigar Stats
Toro
Length: 6.25
Ring Gauge: 48
Wrapper: Honduran Habano de Jamastran
Binder: Honduran Habano de Jamastran
Filler: Honduran Habano de Jamastran and Honduran Piloto Cubano
Price: $7.95

The first few draws are natural tobacco with a slight pepper and a hint of bitterness. Actually a little dry.  Tons of smoke with a nice easy draw. A few puffs later I get some nice spicy earthy flavors. On the retrohale and I get a little black pepper spice and a nice bitter chocolate or coffee. Not sure which.  Burn is straight, and the ash is strong, holds on for about an inch.  Chewy thick smoke. Medium to full body.

Heading into the 2nd third, the smoke changes to a predominately smokey wood flavor.  The further down I smoke this, the more I’m begging for some sweetness to balance out these flavors.

Coming to the end  and the flavors are about the same.  Earth, bitter chocolate/coffee, wood,  and a bit of pepper spice. The spice has ramped up a tad bit.  I find these flavors to be very enjoyable, but this cigar still missing a little sweetness to make this the complete package.  I think this cigar would go well with a nice bourbon or rum.  Something sweet to contrast the flavors of the cigar.

Final thoughts on the Sencillo Short Churchill.  I think it’s a pretty good smoke. Better than an average cigar. I’m kinda surprised one type of tobacco could produce so many flavors.

89 points

Next Page »