Room 101 San Andres Short Cigar Review

September 28, 2013 · Posted in Cigar Review, Short Cigar Review 

The cigar for this review was provided by Cigars Direct; As always, all reviews are my own.

Wrapper: San Andres Natural    |   Binder: Honduras Corojo Seco   |   Filler: Honduras & Dominican Republic Criollo, Ligero & Corojo Seco   |   Box of 25: $169.00; Single: $7.50   |   Gordo   |   6″ x 60

Room 101 San Andres cigar

Room 101 San Andres (Click to go to Matt Booth’s Twitter)

0/3: Big, pretty much gigantic, cigar, with a matte brown cigar. There are a decent amount of oils on the wrapper with no noticeable imperfections. In fact, this cigar’s looks are about as uniform as I have ever seen. I am worried about the size of it though, I am not particularly partial to larger vitolas.

The wrapper is Mexican and, not too long ago, that wouldn’t have been something that cigar companies would have trumpeted. I don’t know about the quality of Mexican tobacco from years ago but they seem to be pretty good nowadays. And I’ve heard rumors about a major, well respected cigar line having used Mexican San Andres wrappers for years but that’s for another time.

1/3: Wow, a ton of flavors are jumping around right off the bat. Spice, dry earth and some fruity sweetness. I’m liking it very much.

2/3: Sweetness takes over as the leading flavor but the backup flavors of smokiness, earth and some soft spice are strong and provide a strong counterbalance to the sweetness. It’s an interesting mix for what it is.

3/3: The flavors become a bit deeper and warmer during the final third. Fine cigar but without much of a zing at this point. The flavors are about the same as they were in the second third.

4/3: Medium-full bodied with a good draw and a decent burn; the Room 101 San Andres is a pretty good cigar. The flavor profile is straightforward and is tasty enough. I liked the cigar but I’m pretty sure that I would have liked it more in a smaller vitola.

3.5 out of 5 points – Solid cigar with some good flavors but probably better in a smaller vitola

Comments

Leave a Reply