Quesada Tributo Cigar Review

This is a very special cigar from the Quesada family. According to Cigar Aficionado “…the Tributo brand was made by Quesada and his team of daughters, nephews and nieces—known as the “Fifth Generation”—at Matasa (Manufactura de Tabacos S.A.) in Santiago.” Before I jump headlong into the review I would like to thank Cigars Direct for this wonderful cigar.

It’s a great looking cigar; well-made and feels solid to the touch. The wrapper is oily. The only drawbacks I can see (and feel) is that there are a couple of discolorations on the wrapper and the cigar may be a little too tightly packed.

Doing some research on this cigar I found out from A Cigar Smoker’s Journal that the wrapper is unique. According to the indispensable Barry, the cigar “utilizes a special hybrid wrapper which was created using the seeds of  the Corojo, Habano 2000,  Habano Vuelta Arriba and Sumatra in Ecuador.” So lets see if this is a hybrid that we can all like.

Cigar Stats
Length: 5″
Ring Gauge: 50
Wrapper: Ecuador Heinz 57
Binder: Honduras
Filler: Dominican Republic & Nicaragua
Price: $6.50/Single

10 Light!

It is definitely an interesting mix of flavors right out of the gates. Instead of the spiciness that I was expecting the flavor profile is much more tame. Sure, there is some spice but there is also sourdough, darkly mild fruitiness and something else that I can’t quite pin down yet. It’s a seemingly minor flavor yet it slices through the other flavors like a light saber through a Jedi. The best I can come up with is something like a tangerine or some other kind of exotically fruity flavor.

The draw requires the slightest of tugs to get a good amount of smoke coming at your taste buds. Good burn and, after about the first third is through, I’m going to go out on a limb and peg this one as a medium bodied smoke.

As the burn line migrates from the first to the second third the flavors are meshing together very well. It is an interesting cigar. There are a good amount of flavors but I cannot say that any one of them stands out as being amazing. What I am willing to say is that these flavors are great when combined. Plus, it is just an interesting cigar. This may sound stupid but this cigar is actually making me think about it.

I’ve let it burn down quite a bit, nearly to the beginning of the final third, and here is what I’m getting. Basically a bunch of heavy but good flavors. The sourdough flavor is gone, it’s more like toast now. Burnt wood, that dark fruity flavor I mentioned earlier and some wheat. Still like it.

The only other mentionable change is in the strength of this cigar; it moved from being a medium bodied cigar to a medium-full bodied one. Thanks again to Cigars Direct.

89 points

Published by Travis Lindsay

I am a guy who smokes cigars.

Join the Conversation


Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

  1. @WILL

    I pretty much agree. If the wrapper looks really bad I might take a point off its score but the main things for me in order of importance are: the cigar draws well, good flavors, interesting mix of flavors, flavors work well together and the cigar has a good burn. Since most cigars have decent draws at least I allocate more of my scoring towards the different components of taste.

    One of my favorite cigars, the Opus X XxX, has a wrapper that can look pretty horrible but it smokes so well that I just don’t care how it looks. Conversely, I’ve had plenty of cigars that had “prettier” (as you noted, beauty is subjective) wrappers that were not good cigars.

    Thanks for stopping by and for the comment!

  2. Not trying to be confrontational here but does it really matter if there are discolorations in the wrapper? Would you rather it be dyed for consistency? I personally think that a marbled wrapper is more appealing–it lets me know that I’m seeing the color of the leaf, rather than whatever the manufacturer stained it with.

    Regardless, solid review, and I’m looking forward to trying this stick!